{"id":13814,"date":"2016-12-13T23:40:00","date_gmt":"2016-12-13T23:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thevoiceoflondon.co.uk\/?p=13814"},"modified":"2016-12-13T23:40:00","modified_gmt":"2016-12-13T23:40:00","slug":"ofsted-uncomfortable-to-downgrade-outstanding-schools-despite-declining-performance-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/ofsted-uncomfortable-to-downgrade-outstanding-schools-despite-declining-performance-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Ofsted \u2018Uncomfortable\u2019 To Downgrade Outstanding Schools Despite Declining Performance DatS"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>More than 30% of \u2018outstanding\u2019 secondary schools in England were kept at the same inspection grade in their follow up Ofsted inspection, despite seeing a \u201csignificant deterioration\u201d in their academic performance, a new analysis has revealed.<\/h2>\n<h3>Reporter &#8211; Chrys Salter<\/h3>\n<p>Research by the Education Policy Institute, published in November, found large numbers of schools are maintaining positive Ofsted grades despite a \u201csignificant deterioration\u201d in results, as the government introduces a new performance measure for secondary schools which focuses on progress rather than individual student outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>The research analysis of Ofsted inspection grades and the new performance data from 2007 to 2016, found that almost 34% of outstanding secondary schools who saw their performance progress stall\u00a0or decline between inspections remained at the same grade, while just 6% were downgraded to \u2018requires improvement\u2019.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">HMCI is happy to report that five years on, we have seen some significant improvements. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/OfstedAR16?src=hash\">#OfstedAR16<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/xHZxQMu3Ga\">https:\/\/t.co\/xHZxQMu3Ga<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/HAI7FJByqw\">pic.twitter.com\/HAI7FJByqw<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Ofsted (@Ofstednews) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Ofstednews\/status\/808389857664004096\">December 12, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Russel Hagen, a spokesman from the national union of head teachers, explained to VEX that statistically \u2018outstanding\u2019 schools are increasingly being outperformed by schools graded \u2018good\u2019 by Ofsted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe inspection framework for all schools in England has changed beyond recognition over the past 10 years. Before, inspectors looked heavily at data analysis but this was then replaced by a framework which was too heavily weighted on things like behaviour of students, the social development of students and extracurricular activities on offer. They stopped looking at how well students were doing, which is why many schools achieved their \u2018outstanding\u2019 grades in the first place. Now that the framework has been revised and improved, many of the schools given an \u2018outstanding\u2019 grade do not perform half as well as many schools who have maintained a \u2018good\u2019 rating for several years\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn order for a school to be truly outstanding, the achievement and progress of their students should be exceptional. \u2018Outstanding\u2019 schools whose GCSE and A Level results are broadly average are not outstanding\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMany schools graded \u2018good\u2019 in every section of an inspection report are outperforming schools graded \u2018outstanding\u2019, which clearly isn\u2019t right\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn fact, Ofsted now views many schools who are performing in line with the national average year on year, without seeing a significant improvement, as \u2018coasting\u2019, with only those performing above and beyond the average benchmark being awarded good or better\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Ofsted grades schools on a scale of one to four, marking key areas deemed significant when deciding the overall effectiveness of an educational provider.<\/p>\n<p>The report makes judgements on:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Achievements of all student groups<\/li>\n<li>Pupils&#8217; development and wellbeing<\/li>\n<li>The quality of teaching and learning<\/li>\n<li>How the curriculum is taught<\/li>\n<li>The care, guidance and support the school provides<\/li>\n<li>How well the school is led and managed<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Judgements are scored on a four-point scale:<\/p>\n<p>Grade 1 \u2013 Outstanding<\/p>\n<p>Grade 2 \u2013 Good<\/p>\n<p>Grade 3 \u2013 Requires Improvement<\/p>\n<p>Grade 4 \u2013 Inadequate\/failing<\/p>\n<p>As of January 2016, schools are now unable to obtain an \u2018outstanding\u2019 Ofsted grade without the achievement and quality of teaching section of the report being rated as first class, despite if any other areas of the school are deemed to be outstanding.<\/p>\n<p>An Ofsted spokesperson said in response to the EPI report: \u201cAs this report acknowledges, inspection judgements are based on a wealth of evidence not just data.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cInspectors use their professional judgement to look at performance over time, the progress being made by pupils currently in a school and the effectiveness of leadership and management.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat means we would not automatically mark down a school for a \u201csudden decline\u201d in a single performance measure in a single year, as this report seems to suggest we should, if other evidence shows a school remains good or outstanding overall.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Progress 8, a combination of the progress made over the five years of secondary school across eight subjects, including English and Maths, is said to be a \u2018fairer and more representative figure for judging schools as it scrutinizes how well a school is doing at pushing students to achieve their best\u2019 by educational secretary Justine Greening.<\/p>\n<p>Progress 8 aims to capture the progress a pupil makes from the end of primary school to the end of secondary school. It is a type of value added measure, which means that pupils\u2019 results are compared to the actual achievements of other pupils with the same prior attainment. The previous headline measure, of the percentage of students achieving five or more A* to C GCSE\u2019s including English and Maths, was said to have benefited schools receiving very able students upon entry in year 7, which typically were the more affluent, white areas of the country, which many deemed unfair.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_13824\" style=\"width: 989px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-13824\" class=\"wp-image-13824 size-full\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/64\/2016\/12\/Capture-1.png\" alt=\"capture\" width=\"979\" height=\"212\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-13824\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Credit &#8211; Ofsted.gov<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The London borough of Harrow, a district notoriously known for its high standard of educational provision, has seen three of its \u2018outstanding\u2019 secondary schools lose grip on their top positioning spots on the government league tables following the ranking reshuffle; Nower Hill High School, Sacred Heart Language College and Park High School. All three schools, previously topping the regional tables, have fallen an average of four places respectively and have been overtaken by schools including Salvatorian Catholic College, which holds a \u2018requires improvement\u2019 judgement from Ofsted.<\/p>\n<p>Alongside the three \u2018outstanding\u2019 schools which have fallen in the new government rankings, previously low scoring schools have now see their league table positions rise in light of the new scoring method, including Whitmore High School and Canons High School.<\/p>\n<p>Prime Minister Theresa May cited that reform within the way in which schools are judged and assessed, both on results and Ofsted inspections, is an area which she hopes to give serious attention to over the coming years.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>More than 30% of \u2018outstanding\u2019 secondary schools in England were kept at the same inspection grade in their follow up Ofsted inspection, despite seeing a \u201csignificant deterioration\u201d in their academic performance, a new analysis has&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":476,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[93,134],"tags":[2035,2717,4450,4601,5193,5251,5476],"class_list":["post-13814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-uknews","tag-education","tag-government","tag-news","tag-ofsted","tag-reform","tag-results","tag-schools"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/476"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13814\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.westminster.ac.uk\/thevoiceoflondon\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}